Volume
38
Issue
5
Abstract
We address the current Extension concern with the issue of education versus advocacy, using a framework derived from the philosophy of science. Questioning the appropriateness of Extension's persistent use of terms like "research based," "science," and "unbiased" to defend programming in controversial areas, we argue that because all knowledge inherently contains values, or bias, this is an inappropriate position to adopt. It would be more intellectually defensible for Extension educators to recognize the inevitable impact of their values and beliefs on their programming efforts. Instead of appealing to "scientific objectivity," educators should be judging the appropriateness of their work in relation to Extension's mission and the values of the communities in which they operate.
Recommended Citation
Blaine, T. W., & Patton, D. B. (2000). Value-Free Extension Education?. The Journal of Extension, 38(5), Article 3. https://open.clemson.edu/joe/vol38/iss5/3
