Maximizing the First-Year Planning Period for Scholarly Publications: Implications for Prospective CYFAR Grant Recipients

Authors

Sothy Eng, University of Hawaii, ManoaFollow
Manca Sustarsic, University of Hawaii at ManoaFollow
Nancy Ooki, University of Hawaii at ManoaFollow
Heather Greenwood, University of Hawaii at ManoaFollow
Christine Hanakawa, University of Hawaii at ManoaFollow

Volume

61

Issue

1

DOI

10.34068/joe.61.01.04

Abstract

One of CYFAR's unique features is the built-in planning year for all grant recipients. We present our evaluation team’s approach during year 1 to establish a foundation and plan for scholarly publications during funding years 2–5. The systematic literature review provided the team with a better understanding of the culture and context of the project’s target population. Collaboration between PI/Co-PI and Evaluator served as a powerful tool to achieving this goal. Not only does this model benefit future CYFAR grant recipients’ and Extension professionals’ curriculum development and program evaluation, it can also inform recruitment efforts and community partnership development.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.

Recommended Citation

Eng, S., Sustarsic, M., Ooki, N., Greenwood, H., & Hanakawa, C. (2023). Maximizing the First-Year Planning Period for Scholarly Publications: Implications for Prospective CYFAR Grant Recipients. The Journal of Extension, 61(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.61.01.04