Critique: History of Speculation?

Harry A. Cosgriffe, Washington State University

Volume

Issue

Abstract

Cosgriffe says that Carlson hasn't really written a historical assessment, but has raised some important issues that any educational institution should consider. Cosgriffe suggests that when using the historical approach there are pitfalls to avoid-- unclear definitions, overlooking fundamental causes, concluding without adequate data, going beyond evidence in making conclusions. He concludes that Carlson's article may stimulate Extension practitioners to be more sensitive about developing meaningful objectives and evaluating progress toward them.