Document Type
Research Paper
Publication Date
4-2026
Abstract
This study considers the factors influencing curriculum development in student affairs, with a particular focus on housing and residence life contexts. Grounded in a constructivist and interpretive framework, this qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with student affairs professionals engaged in curricular work. Data was analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase thematic analysis process to identify patterns in participant meaning-making. Analysis shows that curriculum development is shaped by a set of interrelated organizational dynamics, including tensions between flexibility and structure, the role of language in facilitating understanding across staff roles, the influence of leadership and human resource capacity, and the importance of collaboration and institutional relationships. Notably, participants described a shift from rigid, process-driven curricular models toward more adaptive, outcome-oriented approaches. These findings suggest that student affairs curriculum is best understood as an organizational and relational practice rather than a fixed sequence of activities. Implications for practice highlight the need for flexible curricular design, intentional communication strategies, alignment of leadership, and sustained collaboration. The study adds to a growing body of scholarship that reconceptualizes student affairs curriculum as a dynamic and context-dependent process
Recommended Citation
Inman, Matthew M., "Beyond Sequencing: Curriculum as Organizational Practice in Housing & Residence Life" (2026). Master of Education, Student Affairs Independent Study Projects. 1.
https://open.clemson.edu/me_saisp/1
Comments
Matthew M. Inman