•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Not every published “study” is a research report. Authors of quality-improvement or evidence-based practice reports may use that term to refer to their work, but can we use their results to inform our practice in the same way that research findings do?

As defined in a previous Research Note (Gaberson, 2025), research is the systematic, rigorous investigation of a problem or question to discover new knowledge that adds to the body of evidence in a specific discipline (Gillis & Jackson, 2002). Because the investigation is systematic and rigorous, research results usually can be generalized or transferred beyond the sample and setting used in the study to a larger population.

How can readers of published articles distinguish qualityimprovement, process-improvement-, or evidence-based practice projects from research studies?

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.