Date of Award

5-2013

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Legacy Department

Industrial Engineering

Committee Chair/Advisor

Cho, Byung Rae

Committee Member

Shappell , Scott A.

Committee Member

Greenstein , Joel S.

Committee Member

Melloy , Brian J.

Abstract

Many industrial firms seek the systematic reduction of variability as a primary means for reducing production cost and material waste without sacrificing product quality or process efficiency. Despite notable advancements in quality-based estimation and optimization approaches aimed at achieving this goal, various gaps remain between current methodologies and observed in modern industrial environments. In many cases, models rely on assumptions that either limit their usefulness or diminish the reliability of the estimated results. This includes instances where models are generalized to a specific set of assumed process conditions, which constrains their applicability against a wider array of industrial problems. However, such generalizations often do not hold in practice. If the realities are ignored, the derived estimates can be misleading and, once applied to optimization schemes, can result in suboptimal solutions and dubious recommendations to decision makers. The goal of this research is to develop improved quality models that more fully explore innate process conditions, rely less on theoretical assumptions, and have extensions to an array of more realistic industrial environments. Several key areas are addressed in which further research can reinforce foundations, extend existing knowledge and applications, and narrow the gap between academia and industry. These include the integration of a more comprehensive approach to data analysis, the development of conditions-based approaches to tier-one and tier-two estimation, achieving cost robustness in the face of dynamic process variability, the development of new strategies for eliminating variability at the source, and the integration of trade-off analyses that balance the need for enhanced precision against associated costs. Pursuant to a detailed literature review, various quality models are proposed, and numerical examples are used to validate their use.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.