Date of Award

12-2025

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department

Environmental Engineering and Earth Science

Committee Chair/Advisor

Dr. Sudeep Popat

Committee Member

Dr. Shanna Estes

Committee Member

Dr. Elizabeth Carraway

Abstract

Rendering is a resource recovery technique commonly utilized to recover fats and proteins from unused animal parts discarded during meat processing and slaughter. Resource recovery involves converting waste products into valuable products. Rendering generates large volumes of heavily polluted wastewater. Pollutant concentrations can vary significantly, although rendering wastewater (RW) has extremely high concentrations of fats, oils, and greases (FOG). To remove pollutants, first chemicals called coagulants are added to RW to encourage pollutants to clump together to form flocs. The flocs are then floated to the surface and removed through the addition of air in a process called dissolved air flotation (DAF). However, pH impacts coagulant effectiveness, so RW often requires chemical addition to adjust pH prior to coagulation. Additionally, DAF breaks down fats in RW, ruling out the possibility for additional fat recovery.

Prior research conducted by Ao Xie through Clemson University developed an alternative to traditional RW treatment, known as electrocoagulation – electrofloatation (EC – EF). In EC – EF, metal electrodes are submerged in the water, and an electrical current is passed through them. The negatively charged electrode, anode, dissolves to form coagulant while the positively charged electrode, cathode, splits water to make hydrogen bubbles. EC – EF showed potential as an alternative RW treatment, achieving comparable pollutant removal without breaking down fats. The EC – EF method previously developed was replicated for this project, with a larger volume and a greater number of RW samples tested. This project assessed differences in pH as well as iii pollutant concentrations in RW samples then analyzed the impacts of these variables on pollutant removal during EC – EF.

Initial pH in this study varied between samples, ranging from 7 to 9.5. Superior pollutant removal was achieved when initial pH was closest to 7, a neutral pH, with declining performance for increasing pH. Pollutant concentration had no clear impacts on pollutant removal overall. However, it was determined that different types of pollutants were removed to varying levels. EC – EF was much more successful in removing fats than proteins. Overall, this research demonstrated several limitation of EC – EF for the treatment of RW, as sufficient pollutant removal was not achieved for all RW conditions observed.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.